-
Website
http://michiganmessenger.com/ -
Original page
http://www.michiganmessenger.com/4414/former-gop-operative-explains-why-republicans-will-use-foreclosure-lists-to-block-voters -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Kwaayesnama
27 comments · 1 points
-
KellyLogan
83 comments · -5 points
-
chetlyzarko
66 comments · 1 points
-
ebrayton
106 comments · 2 points
-
Trajan8
29 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Haslett teacher reveals ‘drunk shaming’ by fellow employees
3 weeks ago · 281 comments
-
Compromise on unemployment extension held up in U.S. Senate
4 weeks ago · 137 comments
-
Senate finally passes unemployment extension bill
2 days ago · 6 comments
-
House votes to reduce K-12 cuts
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Emotional community addresses Haslett school board
1 week ago · 11 comments
-
Haslett teacher reveals ‘drunk shaming’ by fellow employees
At some point, the crap will hit the fan in this country, and if you think the streets of Bagdad were bad, read Lucifer's Hammer. A very old book but not to far from where this country may end up.
This guy is a hack.
Not-so-coincidentally, McCain adviser Phil Gramm pushed for the measures that de-regulated the mortgage and financial industries, which made possible the predatory lending practices that are driving the current foreclosure meltdown. McCain has positioned Gramm to be Treasury Secretary should he be elected. Is this who we need at the helm of the US Treasury?
As to the accuracy of Carabelli's quote, I have no idea.
Have you heard Bush address the public? Yet here he is, a high-level operative.
My point is this: your "smell test" doesn't pass my "smell test". Lingo is not a good hinge.
Your "smell test" would indicate that we should doubt the fact that George Bush is the president of the US. After all, he forgot the proper name for the State of the Union Address... It appears that George Bush doesn't know the right lingo for his position.
I don't care if you support Bush or not, that is not the point (I used him as an example because he is an easily recognizable figure). Are they really unconnected? I'm not saying that Raymond is automatically trustworthy because Bush is "the biggest moron in history". I'm saying that Bush provides a good counterexample to your logic.
Just because a person does not speak/write well does not mean he is not familiar with an issue. Perhaps that person is simply not an expert at communicating?
All I am saying is that I am not ready to dismiss Raymond's claims simply because I disagree with his syntax. Like Rayne1 said, he was enough of an expert to be hired by the GOP.
That said, I will agree to disagree. Good-bye and good luck!
If readers would like to make up their own minds about Raymond, they could view interviews with him at Velvet Revolution (here's one link to 4 videos: http://www.velvetrevolution.us/#012308 -- there are at least 8 other videos at that site with Raymond).